Introduction

The global agricultural sector is undergoing a transformation. With mounting labor shortages, rising production costs, and increased pressure for sustainability and efficiency, the harvesting stage—particularly for fruits—has emerged as a key focus for automation.

Robotic systems for fruit harvesting are being developed and tested worldwide, promising to reduce reliance on manual labor, increase throughput, improve fruit quality, and enable more data-driven precision agriculture.

This blog explores the technical aspects of fruit-harvesting robots: from system architecture, perception, and manipulation to navigation, control, and deployment—with references and links to related research for deeper study.

1. Motivation and Market Drivers

1.1 Labor Shortages and Rising Costs

Agricultural labor shortages are a major driver for automation. Many regions face aging rural populations and declining seasonal labor. Robots help offset these shortages and stabilize harvest schedules.
👉 MDPI Agronomy Review (2024)

1.2 The Need for Precision and Efficiency

Manual harvesting introduces inconsistency—damaged fruit, missed picks, and poor timing. Robots can monitor ripeness, plan routes, and collect data.
👉 Zhou et al., Precision Agriculture (2022)

1.3 Sustainability and Food Security

Automation supports sustainable farming by reducing waste and improving efficiency—essential as the world population approaches 10 billion.
👉 ROBOMECH Journal Review (2022)

1.4 Market Opportunities

Despite many prototypes, few robots are commercialized. This gap represents a major innovation opportunity.
👉 Zhou et al. (2022)

2. System Architecture of Fruit-Harvesting Robots

A typical robot consists of:

  • Mobility platform – drives between rows or orchard sections
  • Manipulator – robotic arm with end-effector
  • Perception system – cameras, LIDAR, and sensors for fruit detection
  • Control system – path planning, motion control, collision avoidance
  • Collection system – conveyor or bin for harvested fruit
  • Power supply – batteries or tethered power
  • Data system – connectivity to farm management software

2.1 Modular vs Integrated Systems

Some robots integrate all modules (vision, arm, gripper, base) while others focus on a single function such as detection or gripping.
👉 Precision Agriculture, Zhou et al. (2022)

2.2 Environment Constraints

Outdoor lighting, variable terrain, and dense foliage require robust perception and adaptable mechanical design.

2.3 Key Performance Metrics

Important metrics include pick rate, accuracy, damage rate, navigation speed, and energy efficiency.
👉 Example: Onishi et al. achieved 90% detection and ~16 s per apple.
ROBOMECH Journal (2019)

3. Perception and Localization

Perception is critical. The robot must detect fruits, localize them in 3D, and plan safe paths despite occlusion and lighting variability.
👉 Frontiers in Plant Science (2025)

3.1 Sensor Modalities

RGB cameras, stereo vision, RGB-D sensors, LIDAR, and multispectral/NIR sensors are commonly used.

3.2 Object Detection

Modern robots use deep learning (YOLO, SSD, Faster R-CNN) to detect fruits.
👉 Onishi et al., ROBOMECH (2019)

3.3 3D Localization

Depth reconstruction provides fruit position and orientation.
👉 Beldek et al. (2025)

3.4 Visual Servoing

Robots refine arm movement using visual feedback (active perception).
👉 Magalhães et al. (2022)

3.5 Navigation Perception

Integrating V-SLAM, GPS, and LIDAR allows orchard navigation and obstacle avoidance.

4. Manipulation and End-Effector Design

The robot must detach fruits gently and efficiently.

4.1 End-Effector Types

Clamp/gripper, suction, cutter, and twist-detach mechanisms are common.
👉 Key Technologies for Autonomous Pickers (2024)

4.2 Soft Grippers for Delicate Fruits

Soft robotics allows safe handling of berries or peaches.
👉 Blackberry Soft Gripper Study (2023)
👉 Twisting-Tube Gripper (2024)

4.3 Arm Motion Planning

Inverse kinematics + collision avoidance algorithms ensure precise motion.
👉 Dual-Arm System (2022)

4.4 Cycle Time Optimization

Human pickers average < 5 s/fruit; robots average 10–20 s—still improving.

4.5 Fruit Transfer

Collected fruit is conveyed to bins using soft chutes or conveyors to prevent bruising.

5. Mobility and Navigation

Robots use wheeled, tracked, or gantry-based platforms to move within orchards or greenhouses.

Navigation methods include GPS/RTK, LIDAR SLAM, and visual odometry.
👉 INESC TEC Repository (2023)

Fleet coordination allows multiple robots to harvest different rows simultaneously.

6. Control, Planning, and Automation Workflow

Robots perform:

  1. Task planning (which fruits to pick)
  2. Motion execution (trajectory optimization)
  3. Feedback monitoring (success/failure)
  4. Data integration (fruit counts, ripeness, GPS tagging)
  5. Semi- or full autonomy control

7. Crop-Specific Challenges

Tree fruits like apples and citrus pose occlusion problems.
Soft fruits require gentle gripping.
Greenhouse crops have controlled lighting but dense foliage.
Trellis systems alter robot reachability.

👉 Kiwifruit Review (2025)

8. Challenges and Limitations

Field robustness – weather, light, and occlusion issues

Throughput – slower than humans (~16 s/fruit typical)

Cost and ROI – high capital and maintenance

Fruit damage – soft fruits bruise easily

Adaptability – multi-crop versatility is complex

Workflow integration – must sync with transport and storage

Human-robot collaboration – safety and ethical considerations

9. Future Trends

Deep learning vision systems are improving detection and ripeness estimation.
👉 Huang et al. (2025)

Active perception and dynamic camera repositioning reduce occlusion errors.
👉 Magalhães et al. (2022)

Soft robotics with tactile sensing ensures gentle handling.
👉 Soft Gripper (2023)

Multi-arm systems improve throughput.

Autonomous navigation via SLAM and GPS increases field-scale efficiency.

Data analytics enable predictive harvesting and yield mapping.

Commercial models like Robots-as-a-Service (RaaS) lower costs.

Applications expand to kiwifruit, berries, and tropical fruit crops.
👉 Kiwifruit Review (2025)

10. Case Study: End-to-End Harvest Workflow

  1. Pre-harvest mapping identifies orchard rows and ripe zones.
  2. Robot navigates autonomously using GPS and visual SLAM.
  3. Cameras detect and classify ripe fruits.
  4. Motion planner computes trajectories and grip points.
  5. Arm executes picking sequence with soft or suction grippers.
  6. Fruit is placed into bins; metadata logged.
  7. Data is synchronized with farm management software for analytics.

11. Deployment in Southeast Asia

Climate and humidity demand waterproofing and corrosion protection.

Crop diversity includes mango, durian, rambutan, and longan, each needing specialized grippers.

Field layouts are smaller and irregular, requiring compact mobile bases.

Labor costs are lower, so ROI must focus on efficiency and data benefits.

Limited connectivity means edge computing and local AI are essential.

Robots must be rugged, serviceable, and simple to maintain.

Environmental integration with biodiversity—such as minimizing disturbance to bird habitats—supports eco-friendly farming.

12. Related Research and Reviews

Zhou et al. (2022) – Intelligent Robots for Fruit Harvesting
Precision Agriculture

Huang et al. (2025) – Visual Perception for Harvesting Robots
Frontiers in Plant Science

Xu et al. (2024) – Research Advances in Fruit and Vegetable Robots
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology

MDPI Agronomy (2024) – Key Technologies for Pickers
Agronomy, 14(10):2233

Magalhães et al. (2022) – Active Perception Robots
J. Intelligent & Robotic Systems

Onishi et al. (2019) – Deep Learning Apple Harvester
ROBOMECH Journal

Appendix: Comparison of Fruit-Harvesting Robots

FFRobotics (FFRobot)
Crops: Apples
System: Multi-arm ground robot with vision and mechanical grippers
Autonomy: Full autonomous prototype
Performance: Up to 9,000 fruit/hour target
Status: Active research and development
More info: FFRobotics official site

Advanced Farm (CNH Industrial)
Crops: Apples and strawberries
System: Multi-arm harvester with suction cups
Model: Robots-as-a-Service pilot
Performance: Seconds per fruit
Status: Assets acquired by CNH Industrial (2025)

Abundant Robotics
Crops: Apples
System: Vacuum-suction picker on autonomous platform
Model: RaaS concept
Performance: ~2 seconds per fruit target
Status: Ceased operations (2021); assets sold

Harvest CROO Robotics (B-Series)
Crops: Strawberries
System: Straddle-type vehicle with 16 picking modules
Model: Full autonomy
Performance: Commercial pilot scale
Status: Active deployments

Octinion (Rubion)
Crops: Strawberries (greenhouse)
System: Compact autonomous rover with soft gripper
Autonomy: Full autonomous
Performance: 70% of ripe berries picked without damage
Status: Commercial greenhouse product

Tortuga AgTech (F and G Models)
Crops: Strawberries and grapes
System: Autonomous mobile platform with interchangeable tools
Model: Robots-as-a-Service
Performance: Recognized as 2024 Ag Robot of the Year
Status: Acquired by Oishii (2025)

Ripe Robotics (Eve)
Crops: Apples, stone fruits
System: Arm-based rover using vision-based picking
Model: Service model (charge-by-bin)
Performance: Full-bin harvests achieved in trials
Status: Active in Australian orchards

Tevel (Flying Autonomous Robots)
Crops: Apples and mixed orchards
System: Tethered aerial drones with suction grippers
Model: Fleet autonomy service
Performance: Active pilots in U.S., Italy, and Israel
Status: Scaling deployments

Fieldwork Robotics (Robocrop / Fieldworker-1)
Crops: Raspberries and soft fruit
System: Multi-arm ground robot with soft grippers
Model: Lease and trials
Performance: 150–300 berries/hour per unit
Status: Active pre-commercial trials

Conclusion

Fruit-harvesting robots represent the future of precision agriculture. They address labor shortages, enable continuous harvesting, and collect valuable crop data. Challenges remain—speed, cost, robustness—but advances in AI, computer vision, and soft robotics are closing the gap.

For tropical and mixed-crop regions such as Southeast Asia, success will depend on rugged, adaptable, and cost-effective designs. The next decade will likely see hybrid systems combining human oversight with autonomous robots, bringing efficiency and sustainability to orchards worldwide.